Summary: The Neutrality Initiative is rejected by a broad cross-party coalition -- from SP through FDP and The Centre to Greens and GLP. The Federal Council, academics (CSS ETH) and think tanks (foraus) also position themselves against it. The SVP is the only major party that supports the initiative.
| Party | Position | Core argument |
|---|---|---|
| SP | No | "Pro-Putin initiative"; sanctions ban undermines human rights policy [1] Position paper of the SP |
| FDP | No | Economic risks, 175 years of flexible neutrality [2] |
| The Centre | No | Compromise attempt via counter-proposal failed [3] |
| Greens | No | Isolation instead of cooperation [2] |
| GLP | No | Flexibility central for a small, interconnected state [4] Position paper of the GLP |
| SVP | Yes | Success model, identity, sovereignty [5] Position paper of the SVP |
The Federal Council recommends No. Federal Councillor Cassis: "Fossilisation would undermine its strength." (See Position of the Federal Council) [8]
[1] SP Switzerland (2024). Position Statement. Position paper of the SP
[2] SRF (2026). National Council debate. [Open Access]
[3] NZZ (2026). The Centre fails with counter-proposal. [Open Access]
[4] GLP (2024). Position Statement. Position paper of the GLP
[5] SVP Switzerland (2024). Position Statement. Position paper of the SVP
[6] DDPS (2025). Security Study 2025. [Open Access]
[7] foraus (2024). Cooperative Neutrality -- 7 Recommendations. Note: Think tank analysis
[8] NZZ (2025). Cassis on neutrality. [Open Access]
[9] neutralitaet-ja.ch (2024). Argumentarium. Note: Position paper of the initiative committee
Last updated: March 2026